By Introduction
The term Celsius Drink Lawsuit can be confusing because it does not describe one single lawsuit involving every Celsius energy drink. Celsius Holdings, Inc. has faced several different types of legal disputes involving product labeling, advertising, influencer marketing, corporate disclosures, and regulatory scrutiny.
Some of these matters have already ended. Others involve ongoing litigation or government investigations. They also involve different legal theories, courts, plaintiffs, and potential outcomes.
The most important distinction for consumers is between the closed $7.8 million settlement involving the “no preservatives” labeling claim and newer matters involving Celsius Holdings. The earlier settlement did provide money to eligible consumers, but its claim deadline passed in 2023. It should not be confused with newer lawsuits or investigations.
As of September 10, 2026, there is no verified nationwide Celsius consumer settlement with an open claim process that consumers can use to submit a new Celsius lawsuit claim form. However, Celsius Holdings continues to face other legal matters, including a California consumer class action involving alleged influencer disclosures and a Texas Attorney General investigation concerning the marketing of energy drinks to younger consumers.
This Celsius Drink Lawsuit update explains what is known about the major matters, which cases are closed, which remain active, and how consumers can avoid misleading settlement information online.
What Is the Celsius Drink Lawsuit?
There is no single Celsius Drink Lawsuit covering every legal complaint against Celsius Holdings.
Instead, the phrase is commonly used to describe several separate disputes involving Celsius products and the company behind them. These matters fall into several broad categories:
- Consumer false advertising lawsuits
- Product labeling disputes
- Proposed consumer class actions
- Influencer marketing litigation
- Regulatory investigations
- Investor and securities lawsuits
- Shareholder derivative litigation
These categories are legally different. A consumer lawsuit may ask whether a product label or advertisement was misleading. An investor lawsuit may concern alleged statements made to shareholders. A government investigation can examine business practices without necessarily resulting in a lawsuit or finding of wrongdoing.
For that reason, consumers should always identify the specific case before relying on claims about a Celsius settlement, payout, or claim form.
Who Makes Celsius Energy Drinks?
Celsius energy drinks are produced and marketed by Celsius Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded beverage company. The company’s consumer beverage business should not be confused with Celsius Network, the cryptocurrency company that became involved in separate bankruptcy and regulatory proceedings. That distinction is particularly important because internet searches for “Celsius lawsuit” can return information about both businesses.
The energy drink company is Celsius Holdings. Its official website describes CELSIUS as an energy drink brand marketed around an active lifestyle and states that its products do not contain artificial preservatives or flavors. Celsius Holdings also owns Alani Nutrition, the company behind Alani Nu. That connection has become important in 2026 because a Texas Attorney General investigation involves both Celsius Holdings and concerns surrounding the marketing of Alani Nu energy drinks.
What Are Consumers Alleging Against Celsius?
The allegations have varied significantly from case to case. Some consumers have challenged statements about ingredients and preservatives. Other plaintiffs have alleged that Celsius products were marketed with claims about metabolism, fat burning, weight loss, or other health related benefits. More recently, a proposed California class action has focused on the alleged failure to disclose financial relationships between Celsius and social media influencers.
These allegations should not be treated as established facts. A lawsuit begins with allegations made by plaintiffs. Courts must still determine whether claims satisfy legal requirements, survive motions to dismiss, become certified as class actions, and ultimately succeed on the evidence. The company has disputed various allegations and has stated in its SEC filings that it believes certain claims are without merit.
The Celsius No Preservatives Lawsuit and $7.8 Million Settlement
One of the most significant consumer cases involved the marketing statement “No Preservatives.” Daniel Prescod originally filed a putative class action in California in March 2019. The lawsuit alleged that Celsius violated California consumer protection laws by describing certain products as containing no preservatives while the beverages contained citric acid.
Celsius disputed the allegation and maintained that it used citric acid as a flavoring rather than as a preservative. The company’s position was that the “no preservatives” statement was therefore not deceptive. A related federal case, Hezi v. Celsius Holdings, Inc., was filed in the Southern District of New York in November 2021. The federal litigation involved similar allegations concerning the “no preservatives” representation.
The two matters were ultimately resolved through a settlement. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted final approval of the settlement on April 5, 2023. The court approved a settlement fund of $7.8 million and dismissed the main action with prejudice.
The settlement covered qualifying purchases of specified Celsius beverages and powdered products made in the United States between January 1, 2015 and November 23, 2022. The settlement was not a court finding that Celsius had committed wrongdoing. The final order specifically stated that the settlement did not constitute an admission of liability or wrongdoing by Celsius. For additional background on how settlement cases work, readers can also review the site’s existing settlement information and lawsuit updates.
Can Consumers Still File a Claim From the $7.8 Million Settlement?
No. This is one of the most important points in any current Celsius lawsuit settlement search. The original settlement notice established February 13, 2023 as the deadline for submitting a claim, objecting, or opting out. The federal court’s final approval order confirms that deadline.
The settlement therefore cannot be treated as a new 2026 claims opportunity. Consumers who see websites claiming that the original $7.8 million Celsius settlement has reopened for new claims should independently verify the information before providing personal information. The original settlement provided for monetary payments based on eligible purchases. The settlement structure included payments connected to qualifying products and purchase documentation, with the overall settlement fund capped at $7.8 million. The settlement also included changes to product labeling.
What Happened With the Celsius Live Fit Lawsuit?
Another Celsius Drink Lawsuit involved Celsius Live Fit products. In January 2024, Shaianne Starks filed Starks v. Celsius Holdings, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The complaint alleged that Celsius marketed Live Fit products with claims involving metabolism, body fat, weight loss, and related effects.
The complaint argued that certain claims went beyond ordinary beverage advertising and allegedly caused the products to fall within the legal definition of a drug under federal law. It further alleged that the products were being marketed without the FDA approval required for drugs. The allegations were serious, but they were allegations in a proposed class action rather than findings by the FDA or a court that Celsius products were illegal or unsafe.
The Live Fit Case Was Dismissed
The Live Fit litigation should not be described as an active consumer class action in 2026. On August 14, 2024, the plaintiff filed a notice voluntarily dismissing the case in its entirety with prejudice. That means the Starks case is closed. This is important because some online pages continue to describe the Celsius Live Fit lawsuit as an active case without reflecting its 2024 dismissal.
The 2025 Celsius Influencer Marketing Class Action
A newer Celsius Drink Lawsuit emerged in January 2025. Mariana Dubreu filed a proposed class action against Celsius Holdings and several individuals in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on January 22, 2025.
The complaint alleges that Celsius and social media influencers failed to adequately disclose financial relationships connected to influencer promotions of Celsius products. According to the complaint, consumers allegedly viewed influencer content as genuine consumer recommendations even though the influencers allegedly had undisclosed relationships with Celsius. The plaintiff asserted claims under California consumer protection laws, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation.
The case is materially different from the $7.8 million settlement. The old settlement concerned product labeling and the “no preservatives” representation. The 2025 case concerns alleged influencer relationships and advertising disclosures.
What Is the Current Status?
The Celsius influencer litigation has gone through motion practice. Celsius disclosed in its SEC filings that the complaint was dismissed with leave to amend on August 18, 2025. Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or alternatively to transfer the case, on October 15, 2025.
A federal court calendar also shows a February 3, 2026 hearing concerning the defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint or transfer the case. Because the publicly accessible sources reviewed for this article do not establish a final merits judgment or approved consumer settlement, readers should not treat the case as resolved. There is also no verified consumer payout connected to this litigation as of September 10, 2026.
The 2026 Texas Investigation Into Celsius and Alani Nu
One of the most significant new developments in the Celsius Drink Lawsuit landscape came from Texas. On June 4, 2026, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into Celsius Holdings concerning representations and practices involving energy drinks marketed toward teens and children.
The investigation includes Celsius Holdings’ Alani Nutrition business and the Alani Nu energy drink brand. The Texas Attorney General’s announcement focused on the caffeine content of Alani Nu products and alleged concerns about youth oriented packaging and marketing. The announcement states that a 12 ounce Alani Nu can contains 200 milligrams of caffeine.
The investigation is not the same thing as a court judgment. The Texas Attorney General has requested information and is investigating the company’s representations and practices. Celsius disclosed in its June 30, 2026 SEC filing that it received a civil investigative demand under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act and was cooperating with the Texas Attorney General’s Office. As of September 10, 2026, the investigation has not resulted in a verified consumer settlement or nationwide Celsius lawsuit claim program.
How Does the Alani Nu Controversy Relate to Celsius Holdings?
Alani Nu is relevant because Celsius Holdings owns Alani Nutrition. That corporate relationship means some 2026 legal developments involving Alani Nu appear in Celsius Holdings’ SEC filings and regulatory disclosures.
However, consumers should not automatically describe every Alani Nu dispute as a Celsius energy drink lawsuit. For example, Celsius Holdings disclosed a wrongful death action filed in Texas on April 8, 2026 involving a former Alani Nu distributor. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff consumed one or more Alani Nu drinks and later died from cardiomyopathy allegedly associated with excessive caffeine consumption. Celsius Holdings is not currently named as a defendant in that action, according to its SEC filing, although the company disclosed indemnification obligations relating to the distributor.
Those allegations have not been established as a court finding that Alani Nu caused the death. That distinction is especially important when reporting on health related litigation.
Celsius Investor and Securities Litigation
Celsius Holdings has also faced investor litigation, but these cases are fundamentally different from consumer lawsuits. Securities lawsuits generally concern information provided to investors, alleged omissions, corporate performance, or statements that allegedly affected the price of a company’s securities.
According to Celsius Holdings’ June 30, 2026 SEC filing, two putative securities class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida concerning alleged false or misleading statements or omissions involving the company’s distribution agreement with Pepsi and its growth.
The first action was filed on November 22, 2024. The second was filed on January 14, 2025. The cases were consolidated on March 3, 2025. Celsius was served with process in April 2026 and filed a motion to dismiss on April 30, 2026. Plaintiffs filed their opposition on July 13, 2026, Celsius filed its reply on July 14, and oral argument was held on July 15, 2026. The company denies wrongdoing. These proceedings concern investors and securities law. They are not a consumer settlement for people who purchased Celsius beverages.
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Celsius has also disclosed shareholder derivative actions involving alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and other corporate governance claims. Several derivative matters were consolidated or dismissed, and a derivative settlement received court approval in 2025. Celsius disclosed that the monetary component of that settlement was a $1 million fee and expense award to plaintiffs’ counsel. Again, this is not a consumer payout program for Celsius drink purchasers.
Is There Currently an Active Celsius Consumer Settlement?
As of September 10, 2026, I found no verified active nationwide consumer settlement involving Celsius energy drinks with an open claims process. The most prominent consumer settlement remains the $7.8 million settlement involving the “no preservatives” labeling allegations. That settlement was finally approved in April 2023, and the claims deadline was February 13, 2023.
The newer matters involving influencer marketing, the Texas investigation, and investor litigation do not create a consumer claim form simply because they involve Celsius Holdings. Consumers should therefore be cautious about websites advertising a new Celsius settlement payout without identifying the court, case number, settlement order, and official administrator. For broader context, readers can also review the site’s PFAS lawsuit updates when evaluating how separate product related claims should be distinguished from one another.
Can Consumers Currently Submit a Celsius Lawsuit Claim Form?
There is no verified general Celsius lawsuit claim form available as of September 10, 2026 for a new nationwide consumer settlement. The old claim form for the $7.8 million settlement is no longer open because the February 13, 2023 deadline passed. A consumer should not assume that a law firm advertisement, online registration page, or “lawsuit investigation” creates a right to compensation.
A legitimate claim process normally identifies:
- The exact court
- The case name
- The case number
- The settlement agreement
- The court approval order
- The official settlement administrator
- The claims deadline
- The eligibility requirements
- The method for submitting a claim
If these details are missing, consumers should investigate further before submitting personal information.
How to Verify Legitimate Celsius Lawsuit Information
The safest approach is to start with primary sources rather than advertisements.
Check the Court Record
Look for the actual federal or state court docket. Federal cases can be researched through the federal court system and PACER.
For the old $7.8 million settlement, the federal court order confirms the settlement amount, class certification for settlement purposes, claim deadline, and final approval.
Check SEC Filings
Because Celsius Holdings is publicly traded, important litigation and regulatory matters can appear in its SEC filings.
The company’s 2026 quarterly filing provides information about the Texas Attorney General investigation, securities litigation, and other legal matters.
Consumers can use the SEC’s EDGAR filings for Celsius Holdings to review official corporate disclosures.
Verify Government Investigations
If a website says that a government agency is investigating Celsius, check the agency’s own website.
The Texas Attorney General’s June 4, 2026 announcement is the primary source for the current Texas investigation.
The Texas Attorney General’s investigation announcement provides the government’s own description of the matter.
Do Not Confuse Investigations With Findings
An investigation means a government authority is examining conduct. It does not automatically mean the company violated the law.
Likewise, a lawsuit complaint contains allegations. A court judgment, settlement approval, regulatory order, or other official action is needed before describing an allegation as established wrongdoing.
What the Celsius Drink Lawsuit Means for Consumers
The Celsius legal landscape is best understood as a collection of separate matters rather than one universal lawsuit. The $7.8 million consumer settlement concerned a specific advertising and labeling dispute. Its claims period is closed. The Celsius Live Fit lawsuit involved allegations about health related marketing and FDA approval, but that case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in August 2024.
The 2025 influencer litigation concerns alleged undisclosed relationships between Celsius and social media promoters. Its procedural history is separate from the old labeling settlement. The 2026 Texas investigation focuses on Celsius Holdings’ marketing practices involving energy drinks and younger consumers, including its Alani Nu business. Investor litigation involves shareholders and alleged securities law violations rather than ordinary consumers seeking money for purchasing beverages.
Consumers researching a Celsius energy drink lawsuit should therefore identify the specific legal matter before relying on claims about eligibility, payouts, injuries, or settlement deadlines. For readers researching related consumer litigation, the site can also connect this article with its Paragard IUD lawsuit coverage as an example of why individual product litigation should be evaluated according to the specific allegations and court record.
FAQs About the Celsius Drink Lawsuit
Is there a Celsius Drink Lawsuit in 2026?
Yes, Celsius Holdings is involved in several legal matters in 2026, including consumer litigation, investor litigation, and a Texas Attorney General investigation. However, there is no single case called the Celsius Drink Lawsuit.
Is there a Celsius energy drink settlement?
The major consumer settlement involving Celsius was the $7.8 million settlement concerning “no preservatives” labeling allegations. The settlement received final court approval in April 2023, and the claims deadline passed in February 2023.
Can I still file a Celsius lawsuit claim?
Not through the old $7.8 million settlement. The claims deadline was February 13, 2023. As of September 10, 2026, no verified new nationwide Celsius consumer claim process was identified.
What was the Celsius $7.8 million settlement?
It resolved consumer allegations that certain Celsius products were misleadingly labeled as containing no preservatives even though they contained citric acid. Celsius disputed the allegations. The court approved the settlement without making a finding that Celsius committed wrongdoing.
What happened with the Celsius Live Fit lawsuit?
Starks v. Celsius Holdings alleged that Live Fit products were marketed with claims concerning metabolism, fat burning, and weight loss that allegedly required FDA approval. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case with prejudice on August 14, 2024.
Is there a Celsius lawsuit payout?
There were payouts available under the old $7.8 million settlement for eligible class members who submitted timely claims. That claims process is now closed. There is no verified general Celsius lawsuit payout program currently open to consumers.
Are Celsius drinks involved in a class action lawsuit?
Celsius has been involved in multiple proposed or certified class actions at different times. The old “no preservatives” case was settled. The 2025 influencer litigation was filed as a proposed class action and involves different allegations. Class certification and final liability should not be assumed merely because a complaint was filed.
Is the Celsius energy drink company the same as Celsius Network?
No. Celsius Holdings is the beverage company behind Celsius energy drinks. Celsius Network was a separate cryptocurrency company involved in bankruptcy and regulatory proceedings. The FTC’s Celsius Network case concerns the cryptocurrency business, not Celsius energy drinks.
Where can consumers find official Celsius lawsuit updates?
Consumers should check federal court records, the SEC’s EDGAR database, government agency announcements, and official settlement websites. Court orders are generally more reliable than advertisements claiming that a new Celsius claim form or payout is available.
Key Takeaways
- Celsius Drink Lawsuit is a general search term covering multiple separate legal matters.
- The $7.8 million “no preservatives” consumer settlement was finally approved in 2023.
- The claim deadline for that settlement was February 13, 2023, so consumers cannot submit new claims through that old settlement.
- The Celsius Live Fit lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice on August 14, 2024.
- A 2025 California consumer class action alleges undisclosed influencer relationships and remains procedurally distinct from the old labeling settlement.
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into Celsius Holdings on June 4, 2026 concerning representations and marketing practices involving energy drinks and younger consumers.
- Celsius Holdings also faces securities litigation involving allegations concerning its Pepsi distribution relationship and company growth.
- Investor lawsuits and shareholder derivative cases are not consumer settlement programs.
- No verified nationwide Celsius consumer settlement with an open claim process was identified as of September 10, 2026.
- Consumers should verify every alleged Celsius settlement through court records, government sources, SEC filings, or an official settlement administrator before submitting personal information.
- Neither the existence of a lawsuit nor a government investigation establishes that Celsius drinks caused injury, illness, cancer, heart problems, or death.