By People searching for the RYZE Superfoods lawsuit usually want to know three things: whether the mushroom coffee brand is being sued, whether a settlement exists, and whether they can file a claim. The honest answer involves several separate matters that online posts often blur together. This article separates them and was checked against public records on October 27, 2026. Nothing here is legal advice.
What Is the RYZE Superfoods Lawsuit?
Consumers search “RYZE lawsuit” because several legal and regulatory matters have involved the company. They include the 2023 Younger lawsuit, the 2026 Beltran lawsuit, a 2025 National Advertising Division inquiry, California Proposition 65 lead notices, and a steady stream of customer complaints. These are different things and should not be merged into one story.
A lawsuit is a case filed in court, where a judge can eventually make rulings. A regulatory or industry inquiry, such as an NAD review, is a review of advertising that does not award damages. A settlement is an agreement that resolves a dispute, and in a class action, it needs court approval. A consumer complaint is simply a customer’s report to a company, the Better Business Bureau, or an agency, and it is not a lawsuit.
RYZE also appears as a plaintiff in an unrelated September 28, 2026 copyright case in the Southern District of New York. That filing has nothing to do with consumer claims.
Younger v. Ryze: The 2023 Subscription Lawsuit
Jessica Younger filed a class action complaint against Ryze Superfoods LLC on November 9, 2023, in Los Angeles County Superior Court (case 23STCV27561). On February 1, 2024, the defendant removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, where it became case 2:24-cv-00868. Removal means a defendant moves a case from state court to federal court.
The complaint challenged what it called an automatic renewal scheme. It alleged that RYZE failed to disclose the full terms of its autorenewal program on the checkout page, and a consumer group’s summary adds allegations of making cancellation difficult. The legal theories were violations of California’s Automatic Renewal Law, which in turn supports claims under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act and the Unfair Competition Law. In plain terms, the plaintiff said consumers were enrolled in recurring shipments without clear disclosure.
The case did not last. Younger filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on February 8, 2024, one week after removal, and the federal docket lists the case as terminated that day. No court ruled on the merits, and the docket shows no class certification. Certification is the step where a judge allows a case to proceed on behalf of a larger group.
A voluntary dismissal does not show the allegations were true or false. It simply ended the case. Readers should confirm on the docket whether the dismissal terms bar refiling.
Beltran v. Ryze, Inc.: The 2026 Lawsuit
A consumer-law attorney publicly reported on June 5, 2026, that RYZE was sued in a class action over its discount pricing displays and subscription practices. The post quotes the complaint as alleging that time-limited sales and discounts were present virtually continuously over the past two years, simply rebranded. This is the allegation, not a finding.
Lawsuits about allegedly false discounts commonly rely on California consumer protection statutes, such as the Unfair Competition Law, the False Advertising Law, the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the Automatic Renewal Law. The specific counts in Beltran should be taken from the complaint. Allegations in a complaint are not court findings, and RYZE has not been found liable.
No record reviewed shows that a class has been certified, that a settlement exists, or that a claim form is open. This is not a successful class action. It is a proposed class action at an early stage unless the docket shows otherwise.
RYZE Advertising Claims Inquiry
In September 2025, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division investigated claims about RYZE Mushroom Coffee and RYZE Mushroom Matcha. NAD reviewed statements that the coffee delivers energy, focus, digestion benefits, immune support, and better sleep. It also examined whether advertising implied the Mushroom Matcha offered appetite-suppressing benefits comparable to GLP-1 medications.
During the inquiry, RYZE told NAD it had permanently discontinued all the challenged express claims. As a result, NAD did not review the claims on the merits. For compliance purposes, the discontinued claims are treated as though NAD had recommended discontinuing them. RYZE also said it was modifying how it presents its advertising claims.
This was not a court lawsuit. NAD is a self-regulatory program with no power to award damages or enter judgments. Because it never reached the merits, NAD did not find that RYZE’s products are ineffective.
RYZE and Proposition 65 Lead Matters
Proposition 65 is a California law that requires businesses to warn consumers about exposure to chemicals the state lists as causing cancer or reproductive harm. Lead is on that list. A Proposition 65 notice is a letter, sent at least 60 days before a private party can sue, saying a company allegedly failed to warn. It is not a lawsuit and not proof that a product is unsafe.
The Attorney General’s records show several RYZE-related matters, each about specific products:
- Mushroom Overnight Oats: Environmental Health Advocates sent a notice to RYZE, LLC on August 22, 2024. A settlement dated April 26, 2025, required reformulation and warnings, with a $2,000 civil penalty, $20,500 in attorney fees, and $22,500 in total payments.
- Mushroom Matcha powder: A September 19, 2025 notice from the Center for Consumer Safety named RYZE, Inc. and Amazon.
- Mushroom Matcha and Mushroom Chai: A November 14, 2025 notice from CalSafe Research Center named the same two companies.
No posted settlement was found for the 2025 notices. In the records reviewed, no notice names RYZE Mushroom Coffee itself. One third-party review site describes a “$20,500” 2024 lead settlement, but the official record shows that figure was attorney fees, not the total, and the settlement date was 2025. A settlement under Proposition 65 resolves a warning dispute and does not establish broader wrongdoing. It should not be applied to every RYZE product.
Is There a RYZE Superfoods Settlement?
No verified RYZE class action settlement exists as of October 27, 2026. No court-approved settlement, appointed settlement administrator, claim form, claim deadline, or announced payout amount was found. Consumers cannot currently file a claim for compensation in any verified RYZE class action.
Some websites project per-person payouts or say a class certification ruling was expected in mid-2026. Those pages cite no court record. A real settlement notice would name the case, the court, an administrator, eligibility rules, and deadlines. The Proposition 65 payment above is a penalty and fee arrangement with a private enforcer, not money available to consumers.
Can Consumers Join the RYZE Lawsuit?
A proposed class action is a case where one or a few plaintiffs ask a court to let them represent many people. A certified class action is one where a judge has approved that request. Most people are not asked to do anything until certification or settlement, when notices go out. An individual lawsuit involves only the person who filed it. A regulatory proceeding, like the NAD review, has no consumer claim process, and a consumer complaint to a company or the BBB does not create a legal claim.
Based on the records reviewed, no certified RYZE class exists and no claim process is open, so there is nothing to join right now. Buying RYZE products does not by itself establish eligibility for compensation. Readers with a specific billing dispute can contact RYZE, their card issuer, the BBB, or their state attorney general, or consult a licensed attorney.
RYZE Superfoods Lawsuit Timeline
- November 9, 2023: Younger files a class action in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
- February 1, 2024: The case is removed to federal court.
- February 8, 2024: Younger voluntarily dismisses the case.
- August 22, 2024: A Proposition 65 notice about Mushroom Overnight Oats is served on RYZE, LLC.
- April 26, 2025: That matter settles.
- September 11, 2025: NAD announces RYZE discontinued the challenged claims.
- September 19 and November 14, 2025: Proposition 65 notices name RYZE Mushroom Matcha and Mushroom Chai.
- June 5, 2026: A new class action over discounts and subscriptions is reported filed.
- October 27, 2026: No verified settlement, certified class, or open claim process is found.
Lawsuit vs. Other RYZE Legal Issues
| Matter | Type | Main Issue | Status (checked Oct. 27, 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Younger v. Ryze | Lawsuit | Subscription and automatic renewal practices | Voluntarily dismissed Feb. 8, 2024 |
| Beltran v. Ryze | Lawsuit | Alleged false discounts and automatic renewal practices | Docket details; no certified class or settlement found |
| NAD inquiry | Advertising review | Health and efficacy claims | Resolved Sept. 2025 after RYZE discontinued claims |
| Proposition 65 matters | Regulatory/environmental health warning | Lead in specific products | Overnight Oats settled Apr. 2025; 2025 Matcha and Chai notices show no posted settlement |
| Consumer complaints | Complaints | Billing, subscriptions, products, customer service | Not equivalent to lawsuits |
Key Takeaways
- The 2023 Younger lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed on February 8, 2024, and is not pending.
- A newer class action about discount pricing and subscriptions was reported filed on June 5, 2026. Its claims are allegations only.
- The 2025 NAD inquiry ended when RYZE discontinued the challenged claims. It was not a court case.
- Proposition 65 lead matters involve specific products, not the whole product line.
- No verified RYZE class action settlement, claim form, or payout exists as of October 27, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the RYZE Superfoods lawsuit about?
There is no single lawsuit. The matters involve subscription disclosures, alleged false discounts, advertising claims, and lead warnings, each handled separately.
2. Is there a RYZE Superfoods lawsuit in 2026?
A class action over discount pricing and subscription practices was reported filed on June 5, 2026. Confirm its status on the docket.
3. What happened to the Younger v. Ryze lawsuit?
The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed it on February 8, 2024. No court ruled on the merits and no class was certified.
4. What is the Beltran v. Ryze lawsuit?
It is the 2026 class action alleging misleading discounts and subscription practices. Its claims are allegations, not findings.
5. Is the RYZE class action still active?
Younger is not. The 2026 case appears to be at an early stage, with no certified class found.
6. Is there a RYZE Superfoods settlement?
No verified class settlement, administrator, claim form, deadline, or payout exists as of October 27, 2026.
7. Can I file a claim against RYZE?
No verified class claim process is open. You may contact RYZE or your card issuer about a billing issue, or consult an attorney.
8. Did RYZE settle a lawsuit?
Not a consumer class action in the records reviewed. RYZE, LLC did settle a Proposition 65 lead notice about Mushroom Overnight Oats in April 2025.
9. What was the RYZE advertising inquiry about?
NAD examined health claims for Mushroom Coffee and implied appetite claims for Mushroom Matcha. RYZE discontinued the claims, so NAD never ruled on the merits.